![]() I have addressed the majority of Respondent's Exceptions in footnotes added to the corresponding parts of the RD, and the remaining exceptions are addressed in “The Respondent's Exceptions” section following the RD. Having reviewed the entire record, I find Respondent's Exceptions without merit and I adopt the Chief ALJ's Recommended Decision with minor modifications, as noted herein.* On July 22, 2020, the Respondent filed Exceptions to the Recommended Decision (hereinafter, Resp Exceptions), to which the Government responded on August 7, 2020. Mulrooney, II, (hereinafter, Chief ALJ) issued his Recommended Rulings, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision (hereinafter, Recommended Decision or RD). On July 2, 2020, Chief Administrative Law Judge John J. The hearing in this matter was conducted from May 4-7, 2020, at the DEA Hearing Facility in Arlington, Virginia, with the parties and their witnesses participating through video teleconference (VTC). In response to the OSC, Respondent timely requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. 824(a)(4) and 823(f), because Respondent's “continued registration is inconsistent with the public interest.” The OSC informed Respondent of the immediate suspension of its DEA Certificate of Registration Number A元398117 (hereinafter, registration or COR) and proposed its revocation, the denial of any pending applications for renewal or modification of such registration, and the denial of any pending applications for additional DEA registrations pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Administrative Law Judge Exhibit (hereinafter, ALJ Ex.) 1, (OSC) at 1. On November 18, 2019, a former Acting Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (hereinafter, DEA or Government), issued an Order to Show Cause and Immediate Suspension of Registration (hereinafter, OSC/ISO) to Medical Pharmacy (hereinafter, Respondent). Exception 2, Regarding Remedial Measures.Exception 3, Regarding Acceptance of Responsibility.Factors 2 and 4: The Respondent's Experience Dispensing Controlled Substances and Compliance With Federal, State, and Local Law.Public Interest Determination: The Standard.Recommended Rulings, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links Headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the Provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. ![]() Rendition of the daily Federal Register on does not Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML Legal research should verify their results against an official edition of The official SGML-based PDF version on, those relying on it for The material on is accurately displayed, consistent with While every effort has been made to ensure that Regulatory information on with the objective ofĮstablishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.įor complete information about, and access to, our official publications ![]() Informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal This prototype edition of theĭaily Federal Register on will remain an unofficial ![]() Each document posted on the site includes a link to theĬorresponding official PDF file on. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official It is not an official legal edition of the Federal This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the dailyįederal Register. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |